Tuesday, April 08, 2003Re: Dartmouth Women at WarGranted. if nothing else, this war has made it quite clear that all soldiers in a combat zone, women and men alike, will probably end up under fire regardless of their technical designation as "support." What I was meaning was how many are actually combat zone deployable in a meaningful sense. Women serving as military intelligence analysts or with the JAG Corps, for example, wouldn't ever be put in Iraq until it was at least theoretically no longer an active theater of operations. Or such is my understanding, and I'm happy to be corrected if I'm wrong. Thanks to Alston and Chris for the prompt responses. Posted by Alexander at 9:36 AM Comments Post a Comment (we enforce our comments policy) |
Dartlog ToolsHanover NewsDartmouth LinksNota BeneArticles of note—culled from the Internet by TDR. Nothing thrills a classical music crowd more than a new piece of music that doesn't make them physically ill. "Irony, it turns out, does cross the Hudson River." You don't say. Child rape, pt. II. Moral Hypocrisy What's worse: killing someone, or raping a child? Did Aristotle steal his works from the Egyptians? A theory rebutted. Advertisement  Dartmouth BlogsFavorites
Advertisement |
|
Copyright © 1996-2008 The Dartmouth Review |
|